logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.05.25 2016고단2984 (1)
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a business owner operating a "D Game Center" on the 3th floor of the Goyang-gu Seoul Building in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, and E is an employee in charge of entertainment and exchange in the above game site.

No one shall provide game water for the use of, or display or store for, a game product different from the rating obtained by the Game Water Management Committee, or exchange such tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of a game product.

1. On March 2, 2016, from March 2, 2016 to March 23:10, 2016, the Defendant, along with E, installed 40 tables for all the instant “D Game site”, which was classified as a whole street, and installed 40 tables for all the “blue games” classified as a whole street, and divided I/O Bos of the said game into a certain association, divided 4 lines into a certain association, thereby allowing many unspecified customers to play a game, and paid in cash to customers to the degree of cumulative scores obtained by the said game.

As a result, the defendant, in collusion with E, displayed and stored game products different from the rating contents, provided them for use, and exchanged intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

2. From January 1, 2016 to March 1, 2016, the Defendant installed 40 tables for all the instant “D Game site” games classified as the entire street class, and installed 40 tables for all the “blue games” classified as “blue games” and classified I/O networks into a certain association, and arbitrarily fabricated the said game water into a certain association to allow many unspecified customers to play a game and pay them in cash as much as the accumulated points obtained from the said game.

As a result, the defendant displayed and stored game products different from the rating contents and provided them for use, and exchanged intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The trial records are in the first trial records;

arrow