A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 13:39 around 13:39, at an intermediate point in the middle of the four-distance intersection, on the ground that the victim D was kid in the future in his own vehicle; (b) Hashed a vehicle with a dangerous object driving by the Defendant, in the direction of the vehicle in which the victim was driven by the victim; (c) Hashed the vehicle in the future; (d) Hashed the vehicle in which the Defendant was driven by the dangerous object; (d) Hashed the victim to stop the course of the said rocketing vehicle; (d) Hashed the victim’s continuing operation; and (e) Had the victim’s vehicle stopped, and threatened the victim by checking the windows and telephone numbers of the victim’s vehicle from the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with the above vehicle, which is a dangerous object.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes 11 photographs by filing an investigation report (Attachment of a CD in the black stuffs), investigation report (a photograph by cutting a black stuffs image) - a photograph of 11 by cutting down the black stuffs image;

1. Article 284 and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] There is no basic area (6 months to 1 year and 6 months) [a person subject to special sentencing] [a person subject to sentencing] [a] judgment of sentence] referring to a higher level of warning for a minor reason that the victim affected the victim, making a sudden operation by overtaking the damaged vehicle, blocking the course of the damaged vehicle, leaving the door on the road, leaving the door of the damaged vehicle on the road, and making a retaliation, and thus, the quality of the crime is not good. Such acts are disadvantageous to the effect that there was no intention to confirm and threaten the image of the damaged vehicle that contained in the accident, such as denying the crime, and that there was no possibility of dispute between the damaged party and the damages that occurred during the recent 10 years, and that there was no criminal punishment.