logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.08.10 2018고정1467
특수협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On 21:07 around 24, 2017, the Defendant, while driving a BM5 car and driving a two-lane of the BM5 car in front of the Incheon Southern-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, attempted to threaten the victim by using his own car, which is a dangerous object for the reason of fire, with respect to the Eststren vehicle driven by the victim D, who is driving one-lane in front of his own vehicle.

The Defendant driven the above vehicle, which is a dangerous object, interfered with the course by decreasing the speed in the future of the rocketing vehicle, and the victim changed the course to the two-lanes, and operated rapidly again by changing the course to the two-lanes, and the victim changed to the two-lanes, and the victim changed to the one-lanes and the two-lanes, thereby threatening the victim by stopping rapidly from the two-lanes.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim by using a rocketing car, which is a dangerous object.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The CD (box image) [the defendant and his defense counsel] has no intention to threaten the victim only on the wind that the defendant's change of the vehicle would turn on the string and raising the string of the string of the string and the string of the string of the string;

The argument is asserted.

The following circumstances that can be recognized by the foregoing evidence, namely, ① the distance between the victim’s vehicle and the front vehicle is not adequate, and the Defendant’s vehicle at the speed of the victim’s vehicle, without turning the direction, etc. on the rear side of the victim’s vehicle, was set at the front of the victim’s vehicle. This is difficult to view it as a normal change of the vehicle. ② The victim immediately changed the vehicle from the Defendant’s back to the second two lanes.

arrow