logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.25 2013고단3589
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 6, 2012, at around 21:10 on June 6, 2012, the Defendant, while making a prompt saw in the house located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon, to gather the personal information of E, which was a kind of a fine, by concerns over the discovery of the fact that the police officers belonging to the D District Unit of the Incheon Southern Police Station, controlled the police officers.

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On June 7, 2012, around 01:15, the Defendant forged a letter of waiver of ownership under the name of E, a private document related to rights and obligations, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the right by entering the name of E in the column of “defensor” in the letter of waiver of ownership, stating that he/she renounces the ownership of KRW 8,500, which was seized as gambling cases at the criminal office of the Southern Police Station in Incheon Southern Police Station.

B. The Defendant, like in the preceding paragraph, submitted a forged waiver of ownership at the same time and at the same place as above, to G police officers belonging to the above FFFFFE as if they were duly formed.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. On June 7, 2012, around 01:37, the Defendant was investigated as gambling cases at the Criminal Party Office of the Incheon Southern Police Station located in Nam-dong, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, by the slopeH affiliated with the above police station, and then forged E’s signature without authority for the purpose of exercising the right by displaying the name of E in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol.

B. The Defendant submitted the protocol of interrogation containing a forged private signature to H, who was aware of the forgery at the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, as if it were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of the arrest letter of a flagrant offender;

1. A written renunciation of ownership under the title E;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol under the title E;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act provides that the same Article shall apply to the crimes.

arrow