Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 23:00 on November 5, 2014, Defendant A, at the main point of “G” located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, for the reason that the victim B, who belongs to the same friendship club, acted without any brush to the ordinary line of ships, and caused the victim’s injury to the victim, such as fluencing flacing, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant, at the above date and time and place, brought an injury to the victim, i.e., damage to the character of ear, which requires treatment for about two weeks on the part of the victim’s left side, due to having her beer disease, which is a dangerous thing in which the victim had come to her face, while doing a dispute as above with the victim A.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Investigation report (the medical certificate, etc. of injury of the victim) (Defendant B);

1. A’s legal statement;

1. Each investigation report (the submission of a medical certificate of injury, and the suspect A medical certificate) (the defendant Eul asserted that he/she was a beer disease and that he/she was a beer disease, but the statement of the criminal facts in the judgment of the court below is consistent and specific from the investigation agency to the above court, and its contents are recognized as credibility, and when comprehensively considering Gap's statements and the remaining evidence, the defendant's statement and the remaining evidence are acknowledged as being when he/she was a beer disease. Furthermore, since around December 18, 2014, the defendant Eul made a statement that he/she was a beer disease at the investigation agency from around November 14, 2014, the police investigation of around 14:00, which was the case of this case, that he/she did not make a statement at all memory at the time of the police investigation of around 14:0, 2014, he/she was forced from A to be a beer disease, and that he/she did not have any fact at the time when he/she made a beer disease, but the defendant's claim can not be accepted).

1. Criminal facts;