logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.09.20 2016고단2021
특수상해
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year, and the defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

2. Defendant B is the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 12, 2016, the Defendant reported that the victim B (son, 45 years of age) and the drinking of the victim are drinking alcohol at the 161 large-ro 161 large-ro, Daegu Northern-ro, Daegu, 18:40 on March 12, 2016, and requested the victim to drinking alcohol. However, the victim’s disregarded it, but the victim’s face was a small-scale person who is a dangerous object in the location, making it difficult for the victim to know the number of days of treatment and ear sprinking.

2. At the same time and place as the above paragraph, Defendant B suffered assault from the victim A ( South Korea, 52 years of age) for the same reason, and the victim’s bomb was laid on the part of the victim, and the victim’s face was laid on the part of the victim, and the victim’s face could not be identified, and the victim’s face cannot be identified.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a crime, report on internal investigation, photographs, and photographs of the upper part of the body;

1. Each investigation report (the counter investigation of the reporter, the witness's search, and the witness's search) [Attachment A] / The defendant alleged that the victim was in contact with the victim Eul, but that there was no fact that the victim was in contact with the victim Eul, and that there was no fact that the victim was in contact with the victim Eul, so both the defendant Eul and D are identified as the perpetrator. In particular, the defendant A and Eul directly appeared in contact with the victim Eul while the defendant was in contact with the victim Eul, and the victim Eul had been in contact with the three scambling, and the victim Eul had been in contact with the three scambling, and there was no vision between the two scambling, and the defendant A and the witness were in contact with the victim's refusal, and the victim and the victim were in contact with the defendant A and the victim.

(4) In the vicinity of the victim B drinking alcohol at the time of the instant case, other than the victim B and the defendant A.

arrow