Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 17, 2020, at around 00:10, the Defendant requested guidance to the assistant assistant D (ma, 33 years old) of the Seoul Sungdong Police Station C police box, which was on duty at the above police box, at around 00:10 on June 17, 2020, the Defendant of the obstruction of performance of official duties. Accordingly, the Defendant sought guidance to the above D, on the ground that he did not go to the future of the above police box and entered the above police box, and that he did not go to the mind of the above D’s way guide, on the ground that he did not inform the above D of why properly, and that he did not go to the city expenses.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) heard the words “I going to the box to go to the way to go to the way to go to the way to go to the way to go to the way to go to the way to go to the way to go to the way to the way to go to the way to go to the way to the way to go to the way to the way to go to the way to the way to go to the above D; and (b) assaulted the above D on his body by committing the said D

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on criminal investigation and maintenance of order.

2. 모욕 피고인은 위 제1항과 같은 일시, 장소에서, 제1항과 같이 화가 난다는 이유로, 위 파출소 민원인인 E 등이 듣고 있는 가운데, 피해자 D에게 ‘씨발, 쫄따구야, 너 깡패지 씨발, 경찰 취직하는데 인적성 검사 안하냐,세금으로 월급 받는 새끼가 똑바로 안 하냐, 너 무릎 꿇고 사과하기 전에는 절대 가지 않을 거다’라는 취지로 큰소리로 욕설을 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

3. Violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

A. The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol from the date and time of Paragraph 1 to 01:10, is subject to disciplinary action against the above F on the ground that the Defendant was at the same place as Paragraph 1, which is a government office, and on the ground that he was in harmony with Paragraph 1, on the ground that it was in harmony with Paragraph 1, the Defendant was subject to unfair treatment. In addition, the Defendant would be subject to a disciplinary action against the said F, who was requested by F for the reason that “if he completed the work, he would be able to have completed the work.”