1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 04:00 on August 8, 2017, the Defendant, while running the Internet game in the “F” room located in Busan, Daegu E and 2, the Defendant, on the ground that the game was not well good, and continued to take a bath for the reason that the game was not good, and took an action to leave the kid on the kid, thereby preventing the victim G, who is an employee of the said PC room, from doing so, and thereby, the Defendant saw the victim G, who is the employee of the said PC, to “I am going to report on the Chewing flavoe,” and sexually insultd the victim under the condition of being a large number of unspecified customers.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) continued to set up the keyboards on the books at the same time and place as Paragraph (1) 1-A; and (b) obstructed the Defendant’s business, such as having customers play the PC room in the game, for about 30 minutes, such as having customers play the PC room in the game.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim G by force.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the ground that the police officer affiliated with the shipping patrol box, who received 112 reports at the same date and time as paragraph 1-b, and dispatched to the scene, requested the Defendant to present his identification card, and demanded him to go out of the scene, and subsequently, he saw the above C’s arms on the ground that the police officer assigned to the shipping patrol box, who was called to the scene, did assault the said D’s arms on the ground that the police officer assigned to the said patrol box, who was in charge of demanding the Defendant to keep out of the scene, and that the C was in charge of demanding the Defendant to keep out of the scene.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties of police officials on the 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement protocol with respect to C and D;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Listening to FPC G telephone statements for employees);

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense; Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1.Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.