beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around October 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported loan advertisements posted on the Internet website by the victim B around October 6, 2014; and (b) lent KRW 1,000,000 to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of lending KRW 5 million to the victim in the Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; (c) received KRW 5,00,000 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the Defendant for the loan borrowed money from the victim; (d) 1,00,000,000 from the victim to the victim; and (e) 1,00,000,000,000 from the money borrowed from the victim on the same day.
However, in fact, the defendant was not the owner of the above bents and was not the owner of the above bents for five days and did not have the right to offer the money as security, and even if he borrowed money from the victim without any particular occupation or property, he did not have the intention or ability to complete payment.
In addition, on October 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) went to contact with the victim by losing the height of the said passenger car; and (b) at that time, I would like to solve the problem of “benz car” owned by the victim, not by the fact-finding; (c) if the owner of the vehicle knows that there is a liability relationship, and (d) if the owner of the vehicle is aware of the fact that there is an obligation relationship, then I would like to take over the loan by not later than October 20, 2014.
In the purport of “the same day,” the Plaintiff received KRW 2,00,000 from the said Nonghyup bank account as a loan, and received KRW 2,00,00 from the said Nonghyup bank account on October 20, 2014, from the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seoul, to receive the loan, and the Plaintiff, who claimed for the repayment of the loan, “I would have paid the loan if the loan was paid, and would have paid the loan if the loan was paid.” As such, there is a lot of money to be borrowed from the loan due to the fact that the Plaintiff applied for the loan by telephone to the lending company by telephone, thereby verifying the fact that the loan was applied for by telephone to the lending