logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.11.23 2016고단3871
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B work bonus, and the victim D is the first accident through hosting with the Defendants.

1. Defendant A

A. Around 03:00 on May 10, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face one time by her hand on the ground that the victim was under influence of alcohol, while drinking together with the victim D in Ansan-si E and pentash.

B. The Defendant: (a) committed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties on behalf of the police officers G belonging to the police station of the Ansan-gu Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving the report of 112, on the date and time and place indicated in the above paragraph (a) above; and (b) scams and police officers of the police station of the Ansan-gu Police Station; (c) whether the warrant had been carried out; and (d) whether the said G and H’s shoulders were boomed in hand while doing so

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in the above paragraph (a) above, stated that the police officer I, who was requested to present an identification card by the police officer I belonging to the Ansan-gu Police Station, who was called out after receiving a request from the above He at the scene of the above paragraph (1), was aware of his desire to “this scoo and the police scoo,” and assault the above I, who attempted to injure the above I’s face and to injure the I’

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement to G, H, I, and J;

1. Each written statement D or K;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of assault) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties)

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the commercial concurrence (defendant A);

1. Selection of a sentence;

A. Defendant A: Selection of imprisonment with prison labor

B. Defendant B: Imprisonment option

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, among concurrent crimes (Defendant A).

arrow