A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 19:03 on April 25, 2014, the Defendant was drinking on the front side of the “C” located in the Sinmi City B, and was urged to return home from the Gu police station D District Assistant E, which received 112 report, and called, “Chewing feass, police officers, and the inner fassing fassing fassing fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass fass f.).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning E's patrol and suppression of crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;