(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.06.22 2015구합11771

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.06.22 2015구합11771

손실보상금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

A. Business Name - Business Name : B (hereinafter “instant project”): Defendant - Public Notice: Cheongju-si on September 23, 201

B. On May 20, 2014, the local Land Tribunal of Chungcheongbuk-do divided into D 3,096 D 2,228 E, 3,094, G 8664 E 3,22,250- Y2,250, Y24m2, and 3,094m2 (hereinafter “each land before subdivision”) and the land to be incorporated under the table column (hereinafter “each land of this case”) and the remaining column (hereinafter “each remaining land of this case”) into the instant project, and the land was incorporated into each of the instant projects.

- Facilities subject to accommodation: 1,551 square meters of plastic houses owned by the Plaintiff on the ground of each incorporated land in the instant case (hereinafter “facilities included in the instant case”) - The starting date of accommodation: July 18, 2014 - Compensation for losses: KRW 81,743,500

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on August 20, 2015 - Details of the adjudication: The amount of compensation for losses for each of the incorporated facilities in the instant case increased to KRW 81,94,00, and the Plaintiff is unable to cultivate the remaining facilities (hereinafter “each of the remaining facilities in the instant case”) owned by the Plaintiff on each of the instant remaining land, and thus, requested compensation due to the Plaintiff’s impossibility to cultivate them on each of the instant remaining facilities (hereinafter “each of the instant remaining facilities”) on the ground that “the Plaintiff is not dissatisfied with the claim for compensation, such as dispute mediation, pursuant to the Environmental Dispute Mediation Act,” and is not subject to the adjudication by the Land Tribunal [the grounds for recognition]

2. Determination

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the project of this case is a high-priced road on each of the land incorporated into each of the instant land, and the increase in the number of the remaining land in each of the instant land is widely likely to significantly reduce the amount of sunshine, and the plaintiff is each of the instant land

참조조문

-환경분쟁 조정법

유사 판례

-대전고등법원 (청주) 2018.01.10 2017누3206

-인천지방법원 2015.05.21 2014구합30675

-수원지방법원 2015.02.04 2013구합17474

-수원지방법원 2020.02.14 2018구합72209

-수원지방법원 2019.08.22 2018구합68637