1. The plaintiffs' primary claims are dismissed.

2. The Defendant’s each of the Plaintiffs KRW 73,870,700 and the Defendant’s each of them on January 2018.

The recognition of the project and the name of the public announcement of the project: D business (E industrial complex; hereinafter referred to as the "project in this case"): F business operator announced in Ansan-si on January 16, 2015: The plaintiffs, which are part of the land owned by the plaintiffs, were owned by 1/2 of the lands in the initial lot number, land category, and original area column (hereinafter referred to as "each land in this case") in the attached Table 1 [Attachment 1], and according to the above public announcement, each corresponding part of the land in this case [Attachment 1] included in the project district in the corresponding part (hereinafter referred to as "the incorporated part in this case"), and as a result, [Attachment 1] the remaining land number, the area of each land (hereinafter referred to as "the remaining part of this case") in the attached Table 2], and the remaining land area (hereinafter referred to as "the remaining part of this case] are not included in the attached Table 1].

H 10,314 I 137 H 10,177 J 2,57 J 2,583 K 1,821 L 32,619 M 7,619 L 24,852 N farm site 406- [Attachment 1] JH / [Attachment 2] J H / [Attachment 2] J H / [Attachment 2] J H / The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do local Land Tribunal and the ruling by the Central Land Tribunal of this case filed with the local Land Tribunal of Gyeonggi-do, but the Gyeonggi-do Land Tribunal dismissed the request for expropriation on January 29, 2018, while the plaintiffs dissatisfied with the above ruling of expropriation, the Central Land Tribunal dismissed the plaintiffs' objection on October 25, 2018.

On November 25, 2019, the Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal filed an application for adjudication on November 25, 2019 with the Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal to seek compensation for the loss of the remaining land value of this case, but the Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal dismissed it on November 25, 2019.

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute, Gap 1.