logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.08.22 2018구합68637
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff B KRW 40,061,00, KRW 3,975,700 to the Plaintiff C, and KRW 790,350 to the Plaintiff D and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

Project approval and public announcement - Project approval and public announcement - Railroad construction project approval (E construction project, chemicalization twice; hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Public announcement of project approval: H-project operator announced by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on December 22, 2014, and public announcement by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on July 29, 2015 - The plaintiffs, who are incorporated into part of the land owned by the plaintiffs, own each land in the original parcel number, land category, and original size (hereinafter referred to as “each land in this case”) among the land in this case under Table 1 [Attachment 1]. Pursuant to the above public announcement, each corresponding part in the lot number and area to be incorporated (hereinafter referred to as “instant part”) was incorporated into the instant project district, and due to which the remaining parcel number in the following table / [Attachment 1] is not the remainder of each land (hereinafter referred to as “the remaining land”).

[1] The Plaintiff: (a) filed a claim with the Defendant for the instant land purchase on the 3,950 L 1,495 M 1,721N 1,605 M 1,605 M 1,49 / B 165 / 1650 L 2,4550 L 2,455 K 2,455 K 1,495 K 2,455 K 1,495 K 1,495 238/299 O 992 P 350 O 6421/1,330 Q Q 330 T 1,496 M 330 T 330 T 1,430 T 330 T 1,2931/197, but the Defendant rejected the instant land purchase on the remaining land before the date of construction completion; (b) the Defendant filed a claim with the Central Land Expropriation Committee prior to the date of the instant land purchase.

On November 9, 2017, the Central Land Tribunal deems it substantially difficult to use M land owned by Plaintiff A, Q land owned by Plaintiff C, and S land owned by Plaintiff D for its original purpose among the remaining land of this case.

arrow