logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.13 2015고정2918
자격모용사문서작성등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 28, 2014, the Defendant, at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Integrated Financial Center of the National Bank of Seocho-gu, Seoul, was not in the representative position of the Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and at the National Bank of Seocho-gu, the National Bank of Korea (“C Middle High School”)’s name to apply for the suspension of payment of an account in the name of the “C Middle High School Eastmun-gu,” but without authority, entered the name of the Defendant in the “C High School” column of the written report using a pen for the purpose of exercising authority.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant prepared a report, which is a private document, on the qualification of the representative of CJ and CJ and the fact-finding.

Around that time, the Defendant submitted a report prepared with the qualification of another person as above to the Staff E of the National Bank without knowledge of such circumstances, and exercised it.

2. On September 26, 2014, around 11:30, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s head on one occasion by using the victim’s head at the Cdong conference office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office for the reason that the victim G does not hand over his/her duties to the head of the Dongdong Council.

Summary of Evidence

1. The witness H and G respective legal statements;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of identification numbers, and Acts and subordinate statutes to report;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 232 (Preparation of Private Document for Qualification) of the Criminal Act, Article 234, Article 232 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion of legitimate act under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (as to the preparation of a private document for qualification and the presentation of a private document prepared for qualification).

arrow