A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 6, 2016, the Defendant, at around 23:00 on the 23:00 Gyeonggi-si, had a dispute with D, a drinking house, and Defendant’s daily work at the drinking house of “△△△△△△△△△△”, and was suffering from disturbance, the Defendant was asked from F, a patroler affiliated with the 112 police station E zone of the Gu Government Police Station, called on the site upon receiving a report, and was asked from the Defendant, who was dispatched to the site, to check the Defendant, and the Defendant was asked from the said police officer “Chewing typ, p.s.,”

Han Year Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

Does they drink in accordance with the tax rate.

“Along with a sound, hump, flapsed by a flab, flabing the flab of the police officer, blabed the body and shoulder of the police officer, pushed the body and shoulder of the police officer, and pushed it toward the wall several times by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs, etc. of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for imposing a sentence of selective punishment [the scope of recommending punishment] The reason for imposing a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor [the scope of recommending punishment] was that there is no person who does not have a basic area (six months to one year and four months) [the person who has been subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant puts his uniform to the police officer who performs public duties and took an insulting behavior and abusive behavior, and interfere with the performance of public duties while looking at the pressure attitude.

On February 19, 2016, the Defendant committed the instant crime without weighting, even though he/she was investigated as a fact of assaulting another person.

As police officers in charge of maintaining social order and performing official duties are always exposed to danger, they show the attitude of disregarding the state's public authority and disregarding the legal order, and in particular, they need to strictly punish crimes of violence committed against police officers on duty.

However, the defendant.