A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2017, the Defendant was in dispute with D, which operated the department in charge of the management of the department, in front of the 19:47, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the Defendant was in need of returning home from a slope F, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report from 112, and was in need of returning home from the her assistant F, who was dispatched to the site, and “if the internal police station is in view of the internal police station, the Defendant would have committed the crime.”

Whether a vehicle is punished as a traffic obstruction if it is unable to prevent the vehicle;

After the phrase "after standing on the above roadway, the above roadway obstructed traffic by standing in the vicinity of the center line, and the above F assaulted the Defendant's left hand to restrain this, and the above F's right chest part of the chest was f one time to the left left part of the vessel.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Additional reports concerning interference with the execution of official duties;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act / [the scope of punishment] is that there is no basic area (from June to June 1) [the person subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentence] state legal order and order in order to establish a state and eradicate a state’s light of public authority, the crime of interference with the performance of official duties, such as this case, need to be strictly punished.

The defendant is very bad to commit a crime that directly has a tangible force on the body of police officers who perform official duties.

In addition, the defendant has been sentenced to a fine once for violent crimes.

In particular, it is highly doubtful whether the Defendant reflects on the attitude of the investigative agency up to the date of the first trial of this case.

There is no concern about the sentence of punishment.

However, the defendant seems to have the attitude of late opposite to the defendant, and the defendant's mind.