logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.25 2015고단4956
사기호위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From January 201, the Defendant: (a) operated a company that manufactures and supplies wood packaging materials in Busan Gangseo-gu from around January 201, 201; (b) in order to affix a heat treatment disinfection mark to the wood boxes, etc. for export, the Defendant forged the D's disinfection treatment mark, which is the fraud disinfection company, to use the said mark.

On June 2014, the Defendant forged the disinfection treatment marks (E) around the Gangseo-gu Office located in Gangseo-gu, Busan, Gangseo-gu, Busan, for the purpose of exercising, at the manufacturer of the trade name in the vicinity of Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu.

2. On June 18, 2014, the criminal suspect of fake-based use exercised the forged defense in the same way 20 times from the time until November 6, 2014, by affixing a forged disinfection treatment mark, as described in paragraph 1, on the two boxes of wood packaging materials, which deliver it to F as if the forged disinfection mark was duly formed, as described in paragraph 1, and then using it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. A written accusation, a forged private photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the investigation report on the date and time of the crime);

1. Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448, Dec. 31, 2014) on the grounds that the Defendant’s registration of Defendant C as an export-import timber heat treatment company and the registration of the use of his/her own disinfection treatment mark was also completed on January 6, 2

arrow