logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.17 2018누40623
장해등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following parts to be filled or added. As such, this shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

At the second bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “as a result of each entry of the evidence Nos. 5, 8, 10, 12 of the A” in the second bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written “as a result of each entry of the evidence Nos. 5, 8, 10, 12 of the A, and the result of part of the entrustment of the medical record appraisal of the E Hospital Head of this court

B. The third 6th 6th am in the judgment of the first instance is confirmed as follows: “In fact, the Plaintiff’s use of transportation cards using public transportation from March 2017 to March 2018 is only 16 times. The medical record appraisal of this court provides that the Plaintiff’s self-defensive symptoms include depression, inorganic identification, apprehension, uneasiness, influencing, influence, suicide, decentralization, memory, memory, relevant accidents, and rupture, etc., the typhical symptoms are verified, such as memory, spacence, judgment, verbal literacy, and fluence, and fluence, and it is determined that considerable symptoms have been fixed at the time of the first am in the first am in the trial against the Plaintiff.” The medical record appraisal of this court presented a medical opinion that it is not confirmed that any change in clinically between the first and second am in the trial proceedings has not been verified.”

C. Part 3-8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, 7-7-8, “The purport of the entire argument as to No. 4-1 of the A” was “A’s 4-1, the result of the first instance court’s entrustment of physical examination to the director of the D Hospital, the result of this court’s entrustment of medical examination to the director of the E Hospital, the F medical examination results of this court, and the purport of the entire pleadings.”

4. 8 pages of the judgment of the first instance shall be referred to as "the first instance court".

E. At the fourth bottom of the judgment of the first instance, the following shall be added:

The examination of medical records of this court shall also be as follows:

arrow