1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the part added or added below, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

At the bottom of the 3rd of the first instance judgment, the “25 to 33” is added, and under the bottom the “videos” is added to the “tests by witnesses G at the trial.”

At the bottom of the third part of the judgment of the first instance, six "facts" shall be described as "facts or circumstances".

One set of "A" shall be raised under the third bottom of the judgment of the first instance as "O".

The following is added to the fourth 3 pages of the judgment of the first instance.

In the first round, F was not forced to drink to the participants, except for F was forced to drink abomb, and the second round was deemed to have been excessive by the participants, and the second round was all present at the first round, but the attendance was not forced to attend.

(G) While she testified that he was able to return home at around 23:30 even though he was able to return home at the second round of the judgment). From 4th to 5th below the judgment of the first instance, the following is added:

7) D stated that “I would like to drink to the extent that I would like to cause personal concern to B, I would like to drink with the Plaintiff and desire to do so, and I would like to say that E was “I would like to spawn at the time of net spawn.”

The instant type of meeting was the tenth day after the Plaintiff entered and was in 10th day, and there is no circumstance to support the fact that the instant type of meeting was caused by the Plaintiff’s talking about the Plaintiff’s complaint about the Plaintiff’s occupationally treated in Pyeongtaek or E.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.