1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts to be filled, added, or deleted below. Thus, this shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The 4th and last 4th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be the Seoul Administrative Court, and the 4th 6th 6th 5th 5th 1st 1st "this court" shall be applied respectively to the "Seoul Administrative Court."

The 4th 9th 9th, 5th 2th 2th 2, and 3th 3th 2nd 1st 2nd 1st 1st 1st 1st 2nd 2nd 20

The 6th 9 to 10th 10 of the judgment of the first instance, "the defendant's purpose" is as follows.

The answer points used at the time of the instant test must be reduced by 95% both in width and length. The answer points disclosed by the Defendant are rarely no errors other than the length of the answer sheet in the placement plan. Thus, the answer points used at the time of the instant test are 10 “in existence,” 6 side of the judgment of the first instance, which is not the answer points used at the time of the instant test, as follows.

Comparing the above answer sheet and the copy of the plaintiff's answer sheet disclosed by the defendant, the width and length of the drawing are the same even if compared to the above answer sheet and the plaintiff's answer sheet published by the defendant, and the defendant who consistently recognized errors has no motive for disclosure by newly creating the answer sheet and other specifications different from the answer sheet used in the examination of this case to the plaintiff. Thus, the court of first instance determined "as there is a 6-8 pedal" under the 6th page of the judgment of the court of first instance to be "as there is a lack of further collection by only some entries in Gap evidence 9-1 and 2, and Gap evidence 10."

7. The following shall be added to the letter 7.3 of the first instance judgment:

In addition, the fact that the evaluation criteria for the examination of this case are different, is well known to the examinees, and there have been a long time since the examination of this case has been conducted, there is little risk of vision.

7 pages 8 of the first instance judgment.