1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Although Nonparty C, the Plaintiff’s father, leased the above building to Nonparty E as the owner of the building on the ground D in Busan Nam-gu, but thereafter, the dispute arose under the contractual relationship with Nonparty E, and Nonparty E filed a lawsuit to confirm the lessee’s status against Nonparty C, and Nonparty C filed a counterclaim seeking the name of the building.

(hereinafter “instant lawsuit”).

B. At around 21:00 on March 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) heard Nonparty E from Nonparty E’s bath in the trade name “F” operated by the above building; (b) and (c) followed Nonparty E to the effect that all the tenants of the above bath were able to repair the bath; and (d) he would like to do so, and (c) Nonparty E “I would like to do so, and I would like to do so, and if I would like to do so, I would like to see that I would like to do so, and if I would like to do so, I would like to see I would like to “I would like to do so, and I would like to do so, if I would like to do so, I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see the Plaintiff, and I would like to see I would like to see I would like to “I would like to do so. I would like to see how I would like to do so.”

C. Nonparty E is the Defendant.

The recording of the conversation in the paragraph was made and recorded and submitted as evidence in the proceedings of this case.

The plaintiff B.

The Defendant filed a complaint against the Defendant as a crime of defamation on the ground that he/she defames the reputation by pointing out false facts as described in the port, and the summary order of KRW 500,000 was issued against the Defendant, but the Defendant filed an application for formal trial and was pronounced not guilty on July 1, 2015.

(Reasons for Recognition) The fact that there is no dispute over the same branch court of Busan District Court 2015, 412. [Ground for Recognition], Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 17, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 8, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiff, however, has damaged the plaintiff's reputation by pointing out false facts.