(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.08.22 2014노1263 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.08.22 2014노1263

모욕

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. (1) misunderstanding of facts) The period during which the Defendant received the Defendant’s signature from the Defendant to the customers who have shown a written application (hereinafter “the instant written application”) stating “Embrecing the sound view of society by leaving the victim snow in money,” is not a policeman from the end of March, 2013 to April, 2013, but is merely a single framework from March 25, 2013 to March 26, 2013.

In addition, the defendant was written his signature on the instant coal application in the view of being used as evidence in civil procedure with the victim, and there was no intention to insult the victim.

(2) On the other hand, the victim demanded that the defendant raise 1,00% or more of the monthly rent of 2 years, and made it unreasonable to request that the defendant raise 1,000% or more of the monthly rent, and if the victim did not comply therewith, the victim’s son abused the defendant or harming the defendant’s honor, and interfered with the defendant’s bath business by locking water coming into the bath or blocking the defendant’s bath business in many ways on the part of the vehicle.

In addition, the victim, her husband G, and the victim's son F returned to the head of the appeal that contains false facts against the defendant, and the victim was able to look back.

Under such circumstances, the Defendant had the victim brought a civil suit against the victim, and had the NAN residents’ appeal to the instant application signed under the judgment that it would assist the said lawsuit.

In addition, the expression of “malicious” in the written application of this case is limited to one time, and it cannot be said that there is a large portion of the entire contents, and the degree of insult is also minor.

In light of this point, the act of receiving the written application of this case from the customers who had taken a bath by the defendant while showing the written application of this case is unlawful as it does not violate the social rules.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2015.02.12 2014가단16402

-부산지방법원 2015.09.03 2015고정1362

-광주지방법원 2014.07.31 2014노1324

-서울고등법원 2018.01.18 2017나2045170

-광주지방법원 2013.08.27 2013고단2426