The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a company member of the facts charged.

On April 28, 2016, at around 18:30, the Defendant instructed the victim D (foreign workers of spacn nationality, and male workers of 22 years old) to perform the finishing test to release goods, but used the victim to do other work without having the victim do so, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s breath by spathn by spacing and smuggling.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, according to the written agreement bound in the trial records, it is recognized that the victim D has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on June 21, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.