The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who serves as a vice head in the “C” company B at the Gyeonggi-si.

around 23:00 on May 30, 2017, the Defendant received a phone from the above “C” chropim factory, and the nearby D company dormitory, which is too large in noise, and caused the opening of door to the victim E (59 tax).

Although giving instructions over a number of occasions, the victim assaulted the victim, such as making the victim's left face about 2,3 times drinking, and making the victim blick up to the side of the side of the victim more than three times.

2. We examine the judgment, and the above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent in accordance with Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

On June 22, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, the victim E withdrawn the intent to punish the defendant.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.