The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the company won.

On March 1, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the right side of the victim on the ground that the victim C, who was seated on the right side of the front line, was obstructed by a smartphone during the film string, while 536th World Department Store No. 8rd CGV death, was shotphones at the 2rd N-14 seat before the 536th World Department Store No. 30, and 2nd N-14 seated the film.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, and the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant on October 31, 2017. Thus, the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.