logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2020.10.30 2020누10929
동물장묘업 영업등록신청 불수리처분 취소청구
Text

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except that the court’s explanation of this case is that “Gwanju District Court 2018Nu5146” in the second sentence of the judgment of the first instance as “Gwanju High Court 2018Nu5146” in the second sentence of the judgment of the first instance is as stated in the part of the judgment of the first instance. Therefore, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

(2) In light of the above legal principles, the first instance court’s rejection of the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable. (3) In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial, but did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow