1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, with the exception of the rejection of each description of evidence Nos. 7-1 and 2, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff’s assertion, as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

h from the second bottom of the judgment of the first instance, the term "in the densely-populated area" in the second place shall be modified to "in the apartment complex".

At the second bottom of the judgment of the first instance, "the driver's negligence of the plaintiff's vehicle and the negligence illegally parked by the defendant's vehicle" shall be amended to "the driver's negligence of the plaintiff's vehicle and the driver's negligence of the defendant's vehicle in the accident place", despite the awareness that the driver's negligence of the vehicle would interfere with the vehicle's proceeding.

Then, the third part of the first instance judgment’s fifth part of “realistic point” added to “(4) the Plaintiff’s vehicle, even if the Defendant’s vehicle was not parked in the accident site at the time of the instant accident, cannot be excluded from the possibility that the victim would have died because it exceeded the victim and exceeded the victim.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.