1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits of this case are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The relevant plaintiffs are those who were in the position of the head of the C religious organization E church, and the defendant is a non-corporate body that supervises churches within its jurisdiction, including the E church, as a member association of the C religious organization general meeting.

B. On May 30, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed a complaint with the Defendant seeking the right to collect F, who is a Ethical pastor in the Ethical session. On October 16, 2017, the Defendant decided not to be subject to F’s authority at a regular labor union meeting of 181 on October 16, 2017. (2) The Plaintiffs filed a complaint with the police on November 22, 2017. However, the Ethical public prosecutor’s office was issued a non-prosecution disposition on May 31, 2018. The Seoul High Public Prosecutor’s Office issued a non-prosecution disposition on August 31, 2018, and the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the Plaintiffs’ complaint and reappeal on December 27, 2018.

C. 1) On the other hand, at the 99th session, C religious organization decided to suspend the duties of the plaintiffs to the defendant on the grounds that it falls under the "social legal complainants" resolution of the 39th general assembly resolution of C religious organization, which was adopted at the 99th session, when a person who has filed a lawsuit with the agencies of various levels and agencies of various levels and persons belonging thereto receives or loses a decision of non-guilty suspicion, the path session to which the parties belong shall suspend the public office and the general assembly meeting from the date of receiving the complaint of the court, and the path of the path session shall suspend the public office and the general assembly meeting from the date of receiving the complaint of the court, and the path of the path session shall suspend the public office and the general assembly meeting from the date of receiving the complaint of the court, for two years from the date of receiving the complaint.

On October 15, 2018, the Defendant made a resolution to suspend the Plaintiffs’ general rights for two years at the regular labor union meeting of the 183 regular labor union (hereinafter “instant resolution”).

3. The Plaintiffs are the 3rd Plaintiffs.