1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for four years and fines for 50 million won, Defendant B’s imprisonment for three years and fines for 50 million won.

Punishment of the crime

A housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association in the I district (hereinafter referred to as the "development project association in this case") is a corporation that obtained authorization for the establishment of a partnership on January 11, 2012 and completed the registration of establishment of a partnership on January 24, 2013 (the head of the current partnership J, district J, 163,168 square meters, the number of units of construction: 3,585 households, and the number of members: 2,605 persons).

Defendant

B is an employee of K(State) who is a maintenance company responsible for the administrative affairs of the redevelopment association of this case, and is deemed a public official in the application of bribery. Defendant A is an operator of (State)L, M is a representative of (State) N, andO is the representative of (State) P.

1. On January 11, 2012, Defendant B introduced Defendant A as an arbitrator to select a partner company on both sides while mediating the above Q and R, and agreed to handle all the administrative affairs of the partnership so that companies inside the partnership can be finally selected as a partner. Defendant B agreed to handle the issue of rebates in favor of the partner company’s selection and the partner company, and Defendant B agreed to handle all the administrative affairs of the partnership so that domestic companies can be selected as a partner company.

Therefore, in order to select a collaborative company in advance through open tendering, the Defendants publicly announced the bidding qualification conditions with favorable terms to the internal company, requested the so-called so-called "the so-called" to the same kind of companies to proceed with tendering, and then are willing to final select the collaborative company through formal resolution of the board of directors and the procedures of the general meeting of the partnership.

A. Defendant B, who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery), tried to select the said company as a collaborative company for the authorization of the implementation of the redevelopment association’s project from M, who is an operator of (N) N (N) (hereinafter “N”, and omitted from all the names of the stock companies) who was known to the police officer at the early 2013.