logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.12.17 2020가단114368
토지인도
Text

1. The defendant,

A. Attached Form 1 (1) on the ground of the land indicated in attached Table 2(1).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 2,210 square meters prior to Namyang-si, Namyang-si (hereinafter “land prior to subdivision”) were owned by F. The Plaintiffs purchased part of the shares around December 27, 2019, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as to Plaintiff A’s 327/2,210 shares, Plaintiff B’s 283/2,210 shares, Plaintiff C’s 658/2,210 shares, and Plaintiff C purchased all of the remaining 942/2,210 shares from F on January 31, 2020, and Plaintiff C purchased part of the shares from Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C purchased 22/2,210 shares from Plaintiff on January 31, 202, and Plaintiff B completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the purchased shares on February 3, 2020.

B. On March 1, 2020, the Plaintiffs divided 305 square meters out of the land before the subdivision into G 305 square meters, and 305 square meters into H 305 square meters, and the remaining area of E-land is 1,60 square meters as shown in attached Table 1(1).

(hereinafter referred to as “E land” and “Real Estate List” in attached Form 1(1) are as follows: (a) land listed in attached Table 1(E) and attached Table 1(2) is as “G land”; and (b) the entire term of the two land is as “instant land.”

F Around October 2016, prior to the sale of land before subdivision to the Plaintiffs, F entered into a land lease agreement (hereinafter “instant land lease agreement”) with the Defendant on the following terms: (a) the Defendant cultivated each of the said land and paid KRW 1,300,000 per annum as rent for the land before subdivision and the amount of KRW 700,000 per annum as rent for the land before subdivision; and (b) the amount of KRW 700,000 per annum as rent for the land before subdivision.

Of the above land lease agreements, “land contract” was prepared in writing with respect to the part concerning I land, but the part concerning the land before subdivision was concluded verbally.

The Defendant’s greenhouse of steel-frame structure, which was sent to the lower part of the indication of “design” attached to Annex I’s land surface, and the container attached to Annex I’s ground surface attached to Annex II’s Map, and a wooden building, which was attached to Annex II’s ground surface attached to this case’s land.

arrow