logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.10.10 2013가합15148
건축주명의변경절차이행
Text

1. The defendant shall grant the plaintiff the building permit stated in the attached list 1 and the building report on the structure listed in the attached list 2.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The D land owned by C (hereinafter “D land before subdivision”)

On February 11, 2011, the ownership transfer registration based on sale was completed in the Defendant’s future. On December 5, 2011, the land E prior to the subdivision was divided into the land of 197 square meters and the land of 401 square meters in F. 401 square meters in the land before E on December 5, 2011. 2) on August 5, 2011, which was owned by G, the land of 215 square meters before I was divided into the land of 793 square meters in the land before H and the said land was completed on August 9, 201.

(hereinafter referred to as "the instant land" in this case by adding E, F, and I land to b).

On March 9, 2012, the Defendant obtained a building permit listed in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant building permit”) stating that one unit of multi-family housing (multi-household housing) is newly constructed on the instant land. On the same day, the Defendant filed a report on installation of structures listed in the attached Table 2 stating that a retaining wall with a height of 2 meters and 44 meters in length is installed on the ground of D and 1 lots (hereinafter “report on installation of the instant structure”).

C. At present, 1 multi-household house (Adong) is constructed on the ground of Da and J land, and 1 multi-household house (Bdong, building subject to the instant building permit) is constructed on the ground of the instant land, and multi-household Adong among 2 multi-household buildings constructed as above (hereinafter “multi-household house in this case”) has completed registration of preservation of ownership and sold in lots, and Bdong has not yet completed registration of preservation of ownership.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence 1-1-3, Gap evidence 2-1, 2-2, Gap evidence 3-1, Gap evidence 5-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. Although the Plaintiff’s assertion 1 of the parties concerned intended to purchase the instant land and build a multi-household house on that ground, the Plaintiff’s assertion made it difficult for the Plaintiff to have the ownership registration or the name of the building permit in the name of the Plaintiff due to bad credit standing.

Accordingly, the plaintiff raises objection from K, the defendant's spouse in de facto marriage.

arrow