1. The appeal by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor is dismissed, respectively.

2. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) out of the costs of appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following portions, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence

2. Parts in height:

A. To delete the part of the judgment of the court of first instance that “the combination of this case was promoted from 20 conduct” in Part 12, 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance and that “the combination of this case was promoted”

B. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the indication of statutes is as follows.

1) Each part of “former Tourism Promotion Act”, “former Tourism Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 5654 of January 21, 199)”, “The fourth five sides of the first instance judgment (amended by Act No. 5654 of January 21, 2009),” “former Tourism Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 6633 of January 26, 2002),” “The fourth nine sides of the first instance judgment “Act on Land and Utilization, Management, and Utilization, and Utilization, and Utilization, and Utilization, and Utilization, and Utilization, etc., of Mountainous Districts Act (amended by Act No. 6245 of January 28, 200)”, “The first half part of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed, and the second half part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed, and the second half part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed, and the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed, and it shall be dismissed, respectively, “the second half half part of the Mountainous Management Act No. 25 of the judgment”.