logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1987. 6. 23. 선고 87다166 판결
[증서진부확인][공1987.8.15.(806),1233]
Main Issues

The legality of a lawsuit seeking confirmation of the authenticity of the contract and the contract;

Summary of Judgment

In a lawsuit for confirmation, the subject of confirmation shall be limited to the present rights or legal relations, and to seek confirmation of facts or verification of authenticity of documents shall be deemed unlawful as a lawsuit for confirmation. Therefore, a lawsuit seeking confirmation of the authenticity of a sales contract party and a sales contract shall be unlawful.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 228 of the Civil Procedure Act

Plaintiff, the deceased and the deceased

Plaintiff

Defendant-Appellee

Defendant 1 and one other

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 86Na4264 delivered on March 24, 1987

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

In a lawsuit for confirmation, the object of confirmation is limited to the present rights or legal relations, and to seek confirmation of facts or confirmation of authenticity of documents is illegal as a lawsuit for confirmation.

In light of the records, it is reasonable to view the first instance court’s rejection of the instant lawsuit seeking confirmation as to the authenticity of the parties to a sales contract and a sales contract for its unlawful reason and the lower court’s maintenance thereof, and there is no error of law, such as the theory of lawsuit.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Park Jong-dong (Presiding Justice)

arrow