logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2012.11.08 2012고단739
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On January 28, 2004, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and six months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Daegu District Court on September 13, 2005, and was sentenced to one year and six months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Daegu District Court on September 13, 2005, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on September 13, 2005, and the execution of the above suspended sentence was terminated on March 27, 2008.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant violated the Game Industry Promotion Act and the gambling opening place from around August 2010 to October 18:20, 2010: (a) registered a PC in the name D, which was known to the general public, in the old Si CPC room from around August 18, 2010; and (b) installed and operated 7 computers with D when installing and operating a game machine, which was changed to make it possible for customers to directly exchange the same amount of money as the said cash through the manager’s page, rather than the game money charging method using capital different from the contents classified by the Game Rating Board; and (c) by receiving cash from customers, such as E, the Defendant installed the game machine in the same amount as the said cash, and made customers connect the said game machine to “F,” and had them do so with other Internet users connected with the said game machine and have them do so.

After that, customers who completed the next game have entered their deposit account numbers and remitted cash equivalent to the remaining game money after deducting the prescribed fees from the head office that operated the above game site, and the defendant acquired a certain portion of the fee as profits.

As a result, the defendant conspired with D and let customers enjoy gambling by providing game products different from the contents of the rating classification to customers, and opened gambling for profit.

2...

arrow