Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months.

Provided, That each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are those who conduct Internet computer game facilities providing business under the trade name of "DP bank" in Daegu Northern-gu C.

No one shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from the classification obtained, for distribution or use.

1. Nevertheless, Defendant A, unlike the content of the rating classification, provided Defendant A with a direct charging method using game money by receiving cash from customers and charging game money through the manager page, to customers who find out the same place from around December 11, 2019 to March 27, 2020.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the contents of the classification.

2. Nevertheless, from March 27, 2020 to April 27, 2020, the Defendant offered game money to the customers who found the above DP from around March 27, 2020 by means of indirect charging, which was rated by acquiring game money through the purchase of an Abath to the customers, unlike the contents of the rating classification, in a way of directly charging game money by receiving cash from the customers and using the game money through the manager's page.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the contents of the classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and the select of punishment for the Defendants: Subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B: Although the Defendants’ errors in the sentencing of Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act are not somewhat weak, they are against the Defendants, and they are in the same kind of criminal record.