logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고정2119
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2, 2014, at around 02:33, the Defendant was driving a car B i30 on June 2, 2014, and was in a straight speed at which the front of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Seoul Metropolitan City is facing the guard line at the seat of the Hancheon University Hospital Hospital. At that time, at night, there was a bad view of view at night and there was a parking of the E golf car owned by the victim D on the front side of the Defendant. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a car has a duty of care to show the front side and to prevent accidents by accurately operating the brake and steering system.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving a car while neglecting the above duty of care and was negligent in driving the car, thereby causing the lower part of the said golf car owned by the victim to damage the said golf car to the extent equivalent to KRW 969,325, and did not immediately take necessary measures.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence to take a noise level) at the same time and at the same place as the above 1.1, and left the scene after having taken the place, but around 03:10 of the same day, it was discovered by G to the police box of the Yongsan Police Station called out after receiving a report from Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu

The Defendant, at the time, was asked to take a alcohol test on three occasions from 03:20 on the same day to 03:50 on the same day by the G, and did not comply with the request without justifiable grounds, for a alcohol test without any justifiable reason, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that he was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as the above i30 driver’s seat, the rise was impossible to make a proper tag, and the drinking was reduced by drinking reduction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Control note;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow