The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is in charge of the management office of the apartment house C located in Yeongdeungpo-si, and the victim D resides in the above apartment house and is in charge of the head of the Tong.

On April 28, 2016, the Defendant destroyed the document owned by the victim by collecting and removing the security guards F who worked in the apartment at the time of the first half notice put the victim into the mail (101 to 104) of the apartment in order to hold the first half of the passbook as the head of the Tong, and ordering F to collect and destroy the above notice in the mail of 101, 103, 104, and 104, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and F;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 366 and 34 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines concerning the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination of the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence

1. The summary of the argument is that the victim is an occupant of the apartment of this case and thus, if he/she intends to attach a sign or a sign to a multi-family housing pursuant to Article 57(4) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act (wholly amended by Presidential Decree No. 27444, Aug. 11, 2016), he/she shall obtain the consent of the management entity. Article 53 of the Rules on the Management of Multi-Family Housing of this case also provides for this provision. The victim forced the management entity to arbitrarily make a public announcement of the notice without the consent of the management entity and put the notification in the mail. The management entity may take necessary measures against the person who violated the management regulations (Article 80(4) of the Rules on the Management of Apartment Buildings of this case). The defendant's act as the management entity is the management entity.