1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 7, 2016, the Defendant made a dispute c apartment in Gwangju Dong-gu and the Defendant’s house located in 1201, using a computer for 30 years, using the Defendant’s house to “(in the face of Myeon)” (or without delay, the communication of residents, interference with meetings without any number, violence 112 police mobilization, escape from the control room, seizure of official documents attached to the 112 police box, and seizure of official documents, taking the head of the Gu’s house, leading the head of the Gu’s house, leading the head of the Gu’s house, leading the head of the Gu’s house, making it impossible for the Defendant to spaw off, 2 times, etc.).

해임된 경리 E를 꼬서 가지고는 신구 新舊 회장 인계 인수를 거부하게 하여 회 무가 마비되게 만들고 F 이는 5, 6, 7, 8월 네 번이나 연속 깽판을 쳐서 아파트 운영이 마비된 일이 있었고 ’라고 A4 용지로 피해자 F에 대한 유인물( 이하 ‘ 이 사건 제 1 유인물’ 이라 한다) 을 작성하여 광주 동구 C 아파트( 이하 ‘ 이 사건 아파트’ 라 한다) 120 세대 전세대에 배포하였다.

However, in fact, after the defendant voluntarily resigned on December 31, 2015, the victim F was elected as an auditor by meeting the quorum under the management rules of the apartment of this case at the residents' general meeting held on January 8, 2016 after the defendant voluntarily resigned from office as the chairperson of the management committee of the apartment of this case. G elected as the chairperson of the autonomous council on the same day, the victim H et al. elected as the auditor, etc. (hereinafter "resident autonomous council of this case") constituted and operated a lawful resident autonomous council (hereinafter "the residents' autonomous council of this case"). In addition, in order to distinguish the defendant from the management committee of the apartment of this case where he was the chairperson, the victim F had performed the office of managing the apartment of this case from November 2015, and the victim F did not have caused E to refuse to accept the transfer.

As above, the Defendant undermined the reputation of the victim F by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On June 26, 2016, the Defendant “F, H, and E” using a computer at the place described in paragraph 1, and “F, H, and E.