logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.02.13 2018고정61
재물은닉
Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the general affairs of the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Promotion Committee for Reconstruction of Apartments D2, and Defendant B and Defendant C are residents of the above apartment, and Victim E is the chairperson of the Reconstruction Promotion Committee who is opposed to the Defendants.

1. On July 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) sent out by the injured party to each household on each of the above apartment units 605-dong 1, 205 units of apartment units on each of the 605-dong 1, Defendant A, to transfer the news related to the reconstruction project, including approximately 10 mails of the Steering Committee, the class newsletter, and a letter of guidance on the management of printed articles for household mail boxes, etc.; (b)

In other words, he concealed another's property.

2. Defendant B, on July 3, 2017, posted by each household on the 603-dong 1st floor of the above apartment building on July 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) sent out by the injured party to transfer the news related to the reconstruction project, including the newsletter of the Steering Committee, the newsletter of the class and the manual of the management of printed articles for household mail boxes, etc.; and (b) taken out the postal items of approximately 10 inn.

In other words, he concealed another's property.

3. The Defendant C, around June 9, 2017, sent out by the injured party to each household on the 605-dong 1st floor of the above apartment building on the 605-dong 1st, Defendant C, to transfer the news related to the reconstruction project, containing approximately 10 items containing the “marg of the steering committee, the class newsletter, and a letter of guidance on the management of printed articles for household mail boxes”, etc.

In other words, he concealed another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement protocol (Supplement of Complaints) made by the police against E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of Chapter nine to a CCTV course;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Articles 366 and 366 of the Criminal Act

1. Sentence Defendants: Fines of 500,000 won each;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day);

1. The Defendants: (a) there is no history of criminal punishment against the Defendants on the grounds of sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the Defendants are against the Defendants; and (c) the developments leading up to the instant case.

arrow