beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 530,306,400 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 180,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 50,00,000 to Plaintiff C, D, E, F, and G, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 10, 1981, Plaintiff A’s illegal confinement and investigation against Plaintiff A, and prosecution 1) Plaintiff A’s investigator performing the duty of judicial police officer as the Defendant’s employee (hereinafter “offenders”).
(2) On July 19, 1981, the investigator prepared a false accompanying report as if he voluntarily committed the Plaintiff A on July 19, 1981 and attached it to the investigation record without a warrant, without being informed of the facts constituting an offense, the reason for arrest, and the opportunity to defend himself, and without being given any opportunity to defend himself. In the process, the investigator was investigated into the situation of illegal confinement for 44 days until July 23, 1981, where the warrant of detention was issued due to the suspected violation of the National Security Act, etc. In order to conceal the fact of long-term illegal confinement. 2) The investigator formed the National Democratic Workers Association (hereinafter referred to as the “National Workers Association”) as an anti-government organization, which was an anti-government organization.
Plaintiff
A Since there is no such fact, defective investigators were unable to use a self-statement to Plaintiff A by using violent events such as drinking, each item, and booming body of the Plaintiff, etc.; they covered the milish water on its face; they committed cruel acts such as electrical advisers, etc. flaging the electric flag with the electric shocking the flag in the water boom, spathing, fingers, fingers, sexual instruments, etc.; Plaintiff A, who was not able to do so, led to a false confession of the facts suspected of forming a flag and flag who was an anti-government organization, and engaging in flag activities benefiting North Korea.
3 The plaintiff A denied the charges in the course of the investigation after being sent to the Seoul District Prosecutors' Office, but the prosecutor in charge silents them and then tampers of the plaintiff A.