logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.28 2018노46
횡령
Text

All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A and Defendant B were the chief of H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”) and were in charge of civil petition-related affairs at the work site of I. Defendant B was delegated with the negotiation related to the negotiation with H 641 Eastern Apartment Disaster Damage Countermeasures Board (hereinafter “641 East Eastern”) at the Gunpo-si, J. 641, which was located in the vicinity of I and was punished by negotiations on compensation for damage with H (hereinafter “641 East East Eastern”).

While the Defendants sought the method of receiving personal collection expenses from H, the Defendants are bound to pay the amount of money from H to the joint fund for the entire residents of 641, and thus are unable to pay the amount individually to each member of H, the Defendants were willing to receive the money from H as the development fund for the entire residents of 641.

In accordance with such a conference, on April 2015, the Defendants prepared two copies of “agreement (development fund)” with the content that H will pay 30 million won to the residents of the 641 unit of the K Building located in Seocho-si, Sinpoly, Gunn, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si

On April 29, 2015, Defendant B submitted to H a copy of the passbook connected to the said account after opening a new bank account in the name of B, and submitted a copy of the passbook to H via Defendant A, on April 30, 2015, at around 72, 2015, from the central financial center in the Republic of Korea, the 641 p.m., the closure of the said account, membership list, and membership list, and H paid KRW 30,000,000 for the said account as the development fund.

The Defendants continued to keep 641,00,000 won of the development fund that was paid to the above 6.41 on the same day when they were kept for the said account’s residents.

arrow