logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.09.04 2017고단768
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On March 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for habitual larceny at the Seoul High Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 8, 2017, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Jinju Prison.

[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 768

1. On March 7, 2017, around 14:10 on March 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stored the F point of KRW 4.10,000 in the front city, in the “F of the Victim E management” store located underground in the victim E-management located on the first floor; (b) stored the F point of KRW 410,00,000, which was suffering from the display stand by making use of the gap in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected.

"2017 Highest 1140"

2. On April 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the “H convenience store” located in Yansan-gu G in Yansi-si, Jeonju-si; and (b) at the display stand, the Defendant: (c) placed bed and stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 6,500 at the total market price of 1, 1, and 6,500, the victim I, who was displayed in the display stand of other store.

In addition, from the above day to April 30, 2017, the Defendant stolen the property, etc. totaling KRW 2,418,100 from the front city to the front city, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

"2017 Highest 1207"

3. On May 5, 2017, around 12:58, the Defendant: (a) reported the mobile phone displayed at the “K point located in Yansan-gu, Yancheon-gu, JJ on the first floor cell phone display stand; and (b) stolen a mobile phone of KRW 900,000 in the market price of the victim, who is the head of a household branch, by putting one of the LG G6 smartphones into the main machine and putting them into the main machine.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Photographs of damaged objects and CCTV-cape photographs, the form of which is confirmed at the time of theft;

1. Photographs at the time of discovery of the person to be tried (the fact of No. 2 of the ruling);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of M, N,O, I, P, Q and R;

1. CCTV photographs, CCTV-faging data, photographs, and internal investigation reports (related to cases of unfaging damaged articles, etc.) (the facts set forth in the judgment No. 3);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Lritten statements;

1. A report on internal investigation (related to the dispatch of the scene, etc.) shall be held;

arrow