The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant to the punishment (three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant committed the instant crime by committing the instant crime, which cannot be deemed to be light of the instant case due to the injury of the victim, such as a frush that requires the treatment of about five weeks, and the Defendant committed the instant crime by continuously committing the instant crime by leaving the victim under his own bus after having sold the victim at one time, and continuing to follow the victim’s use of his bus, and the method of committing the instant crime is very poor. The instant case was the victim’s demand to cut the vehicle from gas charging stations, and the victim’s demand to cut the vehicle from the gas charging station was her age, and it is difficult to clearly understand the Defendant’s assertion that the victim committed an assault against the victim during the anti-end period. The Defendant was sentenced to suspended sentence for the same criminal offense, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive and circumstance of the Defendant, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., were considered as the whole, and thus, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s punishment is excessively unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.