logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.11.23 2018고합241
뇌물수수
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Pursuant to Article 26 of the Criminal Act, the defendant worked as a public official in charge of the application of Articles 129 through 132 of the Criminal Act, and retired from the retirement age as of January 1, 2018; from around 2002 to May 16, 2012, the defendant worked as the personnel management team, the general affairs team, the safety team, the purchase team, and the research support team; and he/she was dispatched to C on May 17, 2012 to December 31, 2016 and was in charge of the purchase and welfare team, the purchase and welfare team, and the fund management team and the fund management team from around December 31, 2016 to around December 31, 2016, concurrently held office as the purchase and welfare team leader (the fund management team, the fund management team, and the fund management team leader from around March 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016.

A. On December 17, 201, the Defendant received KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000 from 33 persons related to the transaction of B, as shown in the attached Table 1 table of crime, to the effect that “the convenience of entering into contracts with B, etc. in the future” from G representative H, the transaction entity of B, which is an open in the Defendant’s married ceremony, from “Ewabing 2nd Furg” located in Daejeon P around December 17, 201.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties.

B. On February 27, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 100,000,00,000,000,000,000 from 54 persons related to B and C, as shown in attached Table 2, to the effect that, in the case of the Defendant’s marriage, the Defendant, opened in the south-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, “JK Hall,” the Defendant, a transaction entity of C, would offer convenience, such as entering into a contract with B,” from the representative of the KJL, a transaction entity of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties.

2. The gist of the defendant's and his defense counsel's arguments are as follows.

arrow