Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. No one shall engage in sexual intercourse or arrange or provide a place for sexual traffic in return for giving, receiving or promising to give, receive, or promise to give, money, valuables or other property benefits to unspecified persons;

Nevertheless, around 20:20 on June 30, 2014, the Defendant divided the division into the C user center in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, and the second floor, installed simple beds, etc., employed female employees D, and provided them with good offices and places for sexual buyers and sexual traffic in the same place.

2. No person shall perform any act prescribed in subparagraph 19 of Article 6 of the School Health Act in school environmental sanitation and cleanup zones;

Nevertheless, the defendant arranged sexual traffic at the places specified in paragraph (1) of the school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone of Gwangju Port.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (investigation into the enemy site);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 19 (2) and Article 6 (1) 19 of the School Health Act (a place of business which is prohibited in the school environmental sanitation and cleanup zone);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant did not have the same criminal history and seems economically difficult, but the social harm caused by sexual traffic exists in the school cleanup zone. The business of this case is also in the school cleanup zone. The defendant attempted to operate the user without the qualification of the user and attempted to operate the user, and it seems that the defendant was aware of the actual condition of the user because he attempted to operate the user.