A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery and uttering of private documents dated September 18, 2012;

A. On September 18, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document with the name of “D” office with the 318,400,000 won or more from the “D” office of the Defendant’s 13th floor of Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul building, prepared a “goods delivery note” with the computer to E by September 20, 2012, and affixed the seal of the E representative director F and the official seal of E representative director.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, forged a letter of order for the issuance of goods in the name of E representative director, which is a private document.

B. On September 18, 2012, the Defendant’s uttering of the above investigation documents to the vice president of HU who is unaware of the forged facts at H office located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, Seoul.

As in the same paragraph, a forged order for the issuance of goods was presented as if they were genuinely prepared.

2. The fraud Defendant: (a) around September 20, 2012, No. 1-B.

At the same place as mentioned in Paragraph (1), the victim H vice president I believed that the above forged letter of order issued was genuine, and received 34,000 gift certificates from piracy 318,40,000 won at the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the property by deceiving the victim.

3. Forgery and uttering of private documents dated September 20, 2012

A. On September 20, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents No. 1-A.

In the same place as Paragraph 3, a “written confirmation of supply” with the content that “the market price of 34,000,000 cultural products was supplied to E” was equivalent to KRW 318,40,000, using the computer, and the name of E representative director F was stamped with the seal of E representative director and the seal of E representative director.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a certificate of delivery in the name of E representative director, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact.

B. On September 2012, 201, the Defendant for the uttering of a falsified document.

Section 2(A) to I who is not aware of the forgery in the same place as in the same paragraph.

(b) as provided in paragraph (3);