A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, despite the fact that he is not a handler of narcotics, handled narcotics as follows:

1. On June 20, 2017, around 01:00, the Defendant administered a philopon in a way that mecopon (a single philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) incopon (a single mecopon”) incopon (a single mecopon equivalent to a single mecopon) purchased as indicated in the lower body 788 of 2018 at the end of Busan Suwon-gu, Busan, which is one’s own residence.

2. On June 21, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as paragraphs (1) and (20:00, administered phiphones in a single-use injection machine, dilution with water, and in a way of injecting them into the arms blood transfusion.

3. On June 22, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as paragraphs (1) and (2) of 20:0, injected phiphones in a single-use injection machine with water, dilution with water, and administered phiphones by means of injecting them into the body blood transfusion.

4. On June 23, 2017, the Defendant, at the same place as paragraphs (1) and (2) of this Article, injected phiphones in a single-use injection machine, dilution with water, and in a way of injecting them into the body blood transfusion, at around 21:00.

5. On September 6, 2017, at around 03:00, the Defendant: (a) inserted 0.03 gopon into a single-use copon in the singing room located in Busan Singdong-gu C; (b) dumped with water; and (c) administered copon in a way of injecting it into the blood cells.

6. On September 8, 2017, around 04:00, the Defendant put about approximately 0.03g of philopon into a single-use injection machine at the inn room where it is impossible to identify the trade name located in the Nam-gu Busan, Nam-gu, Busan, and dumped with water, and administered philopon in a way of injection into the spopon.

The Defendant and E, “2018 Highest 788,” are not narcotics handlers.

After purchasing narcotics through the Internet, the Defendants sold them and gathered to divide the profits therefrom, and the Defendant colored the seller of narcotics through the Internet and conspired to provide E with the purchase price.