logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.04.20 2016고단2485
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for six months with labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediating, etc. of sexual traffic at the Jeonju District Court on September 8, 2016, and the probation period becomes final and conclusive on the 20th of the same month.

[Criminal facts]

1. From the end of November 2016 to December 15, 2016, the Defendants employed the E of Russia’s nationality and F of the Thailand’s nationality, an employee of sexual traffic women, and contacted with the male customers who wanting to engage in sexual traffic through smartphone, “G” and “H, etc.” during the period from the end of November 2016 to the end of the day of December 15, 2016, and upon receiving KRW 1.20,00 won from the male grandchildren, the Defendants would pay KRW 60,00 to the sexual traffic women, and upon receiving KRW 1.20,000 from the male grandchildren, made profits by having the said female sexual traffic women engage in sexual traffic with their sexual intercourses.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

2. If a foreigner violating the Immigration Control Act intends to find a job in the Republic of Korea, he/she shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, and no person shall employ any person without the status of sojourn;

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to engage in the act such as arranging sexual traffic at the time, place, etc. described in paragraph (1) and employed the above E and F as female employees, who did not have the status of sojourn for engaging in job-seeking activities, as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment]

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against F and E;

1. Each protocol of seizure and list of seizure of police officers, report on internal investigation (the details of commencement of internal investigation), report on internal investigation (the case of search and seizure), report on investigation (B's statement and number of cases of purchase of sex), investigation report (the contents of the voluntarily submitted mobile phone analysis), investigation report (the calculation of additional charges);

1. Books of commercial sex acts, each of them;

arrow