1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 360,000,000 to the Plaintiff and Defendant B with respect thereto from November 15, 2017, and Defendant C.

1. Basic facts (applicable for recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply);

(2) Each entry and the purport of the whole pleading

A. From November 3, 2016 to January 12, 2017, the Defendants remitted to the Plaintiff KRW 129,000,000 via 16 times as follows (hereinafter “instant money”).

Serial 12016-11-03 13,00,00 20 2016-11-04 25,000,00 32016-11-10,000 4 2016-10,11-10,000 5 201-11, 15,000 6 2000 6 016-16-115, 000 00 006-11-175, 000, 000 06-1175, 000, 20008 2016-11-118, 200-200, 200-10-10, 201-230-16, 2010-10-16, 20000 201-230-16

B. From December 14, 2016 to April 20, 2017, the Plaintiff remitted the Defendants KRW 497,173,000 to the following 19 times.

Serial 12016-12-14, 857,00 20 2016-12-30,840, 2017-02 4,956,00 4207-02-02, 2017-02-00 30,000 6 2017-02-000 30,000 6 007-02-2040, 507-2007 07-2130-2130, 2070-140, 2007-207 00-407, 2007-207 00-140, 2000, 20008-207-240, 2007-240-30, 007-10-30-130, 007

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the claim is that the Plaintiff agreed to pay interest calculated at 20% by borrowing the instant money from the Defendants without fixing the due date for payment in order to prepare funds for purchase of goods necessary for the cosmetics distribution business, and the instant money is subject to the Interest Limitation Act with the loan. Since the Plaintiff paid KRW 360 million in excess of the maximum interest rate under the Interest Limitation Act, the Defendants shall return the said money to the Plaintiff in unjust enrichment.

As to this, the Defendants’ money is the cosmetics operated by the Plaintiff.